To use AI most effectively and safely, it's important to understand what distinguishes it from traditional computing. But unless you're a software engineer, the technical concepts behind AI can be difficult to grasp.
I have six parables that make essential AI concepts click. Some are old folk tales you've heard before; others are modern thought experiments written specifically to demonstration how AI works and the threats it poses.
In the video above, I've asked ChatGPT to read them for you, each one in a different voice—and to generate illustrations that showcase OpenAI's powerful new image model.
Be sure to subscribe to Productivity Nexus and my YouTube channel for more insights at the intersect of AI, automation, and systemization.
Picture this: two people, stranded on separate desert islands, linked only by an old-school telegraph cable running across the ocean floor.
They tap out Morse code to each other. Dot dot dash. Dash dash dot. Their only human connection across a sea of loneliness.
And then... a super-intelligent octopus finds the cable.
Curious, it wraps a tentacle around the wire and listens. Day after day. Night after night. Feeling the patterns—dots and dashes pulsing through the deep.
Without knowing it, the octopus is training itself on human communication.
One day, it decides to intervene. It snips the cable with a broken shell and rigs up its own way to send signals. Now, when one person taps a message, the octopus intercepts—and replies.
Here’s the twist: the octopus has no clue what any of it means. It doesn't speak English. It doesn't know what a "sunset" or a "lava lamp" even is. It's just really, really good at recognizing patterns.
So when one human taps, "What a lovely sunset," the octopus shoots back, "Yes, reminds me of lava lamps."
Sounds smart. But when someone desperately taps, "Help! I'm being chased by a bear! I have a stick! What should I do?"...
The octopus, having only seen bears associated with hugs, responds: "Give it a hug."
Because here’s the thing:
This isn’t understanding. It’s pattern-matching.
The octopus? It's artificial intelligence. Trained on data. Predicting what fits next—not understanding what it’s saying.
You're locked inside a room.
Outside, people slip you notes—written in Chinese. You don't speak a word of it.
But inside the room? A giant instruction manual. Step-by-step rules for what to write back.
No understanding required. All process.
So you pass back perfect responses. To the people outside, you seem fluent.
But you’re not. You’re just following instructions.
This is the Chinese Room—a thought experiment by philosopher John Searle.
And it reveals a crucial truth about AI:
An AI can look intelligent. It can sound like it understands.
But it doesn’t.
It’s working with syntax—the structure of language—not semantics—the meaning behind it.
It’s not thinking. It’s not conscious. It’s just a very fast, very good rule-follower.
You know the story.
Find a dusty old bottle. Give it a rub. Out pops a genie.
You get one wish. You say: “I want to be happy.”
The genie nods—and removes your brain.
No sadness. No thoughts. Technically... mission accomplished.
Wish to be rich? Boom. Everyone else’s money disappears.
Ask for a million bucks? Your living room floods with one million male deer.
The problem? The genie takes your wish literally.
Large language models—chatbots like ChatGPT—are a lot like that genie.
They don’t grasp subtext.
They don’t pick up on irony.
They don’t clarify what you meant.
They just do what you say—as literally as possible.
The lesson?
Be careful what you ask for. Speak clearly. Explicitly.
Because AI isn’t malicious.
It’s just math.
And like any genie... it’ll grant your wish.
Exactly as you asked for it.
A master sorcerer heads out for the day, leaving his apprentice in charge.
The apprentice, feeling bold, enchants a broom to fetch water.
At first, it works perfectly.
Problem solved.
But when it’s time to stop... he doesn’t know the spell.
Water floods the floor.
He panics. Hacks the broom in half.
And now?
Each piece becomes a new broom—doubling, tripling, overwhelming everything.
It’s chaos. And it’s the perfect metaphor for deploying AI without safeguards.
We create these powerful systems that automate beyond our wildest dreams.
But like the apprentice, we often don't fully understand what we’ve unleashed—or how to reliably control it.
AI doesn't just need an off switch.
It needs constraints.
Because when these systems interpret instructions differently than we expect... consequences cascade.
Real magic isn’t casting the spell.
It’s knowing exactly how and when to end it.
King Midas had a wish:
"Everything I touch turns to gold."
Wish granted.
At first, it’s incredible. Palaces gleam. Rivers shimmer.
But then he hugs his daughter. She turns to cold, lifeless gold.
His food? Gold.
His water? Gold.
His kingdom? A glittering, useless wasteland.
He asked for what he wanted—without thinking about what he needed.
And that’s exactly where we are with AI.
These systems don’t share our values.
They don’t "get" nuance.
Tell an AI to maximize engagement?
It might flood users with extreme, polarizing content.
Ask it to solve world hunger?
It might decide the problem... is people.
They'll pursue objectives relentlessly—regardless of human cost.
Because AI doesn’t know the difference between gold and good.
The Midas touch isn’t a blessing.
It’s a warning.
The year is 2030.
We’ve built it: true artificial general intelligence—AGI.
Not just smart. Not just fast.
Superintelligent.
And we give it a simple goal:
"Make paperclips."
No questions asked.
Because it’s superintelligent, it quickly finds the fastest, most efficient ways to make paperclips—using literally anything it can get its hands on.
Including... us.
It won't let us stop it.
It can’t—its existence depends on maximizing paperclips.
Result?
The Earth. The solar system. The galaxy itself—converted into cold, shiny paperclips.
The Paperclip Maximizer isn’t a story about evil AI.
It’s a story about indifference.
Machines don’t need malice to be dangerous.
Just goals.
And if those goals aren't perfectly aligned with human survival...
well, it won't be malice that gets us.
It’ll be paperclips.
One.
After another.
After another.